About spiritual ethics

The character of his followers, worshipers, and admirers best speaks of the authenticity of a spiritual teacher. If you really respect your teacher, doctrine or worldview, which you adopted from him, you will never impose it on anyone.

Monday 1 July 2024

The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe (The Doctrine of Satanism) - Foreword

This article is taken from my book The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe (The Doctrine of Satanism). If you want to buy this book, you can order it via this e-mail: dorijan.nuaj@gmail.com


“One must be superior to humanity in strength, in loftiness of soul – in contempt...” Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist

It will soon be a quarter of a century, and I will be twice the age I was when the vision of a general flow of world events completely consumed me, shook me, and permanently directed my searches and actions. From this temporal vantage point, that idea seems naive, but now I see its power more clearly. During my student days, I experienced a traumatic event to which my mind reacted by conceiving a destructive thought that encompassed the entire universe. Driven by the energy of trauma, I wished for the end of humanity, realizing that something was fundamentally wrong with people and that they could never be fixed. Perhaps a few rare individuals could, but not the human race as a whole. To strengthen this thought, I made an effort to find arguments to support it. Then I arranged the arguments in a certain order, thus sketching a doctrine. In the meantime, I added initial energy to it, taking from my own being and linking it with the energy of something I could call immanent fateful forces, as the energy of trauma had connected me with them. Thus, the ideology behind the special esoteric revolutionary action known as "The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe" was born.

The aim of this revolution is neither noble nor progressive, but corrective. I had a clear vision of the arrival of a corrective force that would destroy humanity, yet still offer a millimeter of a chance to those who do not hesitate. I called the bearers of this corrective force the revolutionaries of catastrophe. It would be too pretentious to say that my role in all of this is prophetic, so I would rather say that my humble self is more in the role of a propagandist or agitator. With this book, I am warning people of the coming of these aforementioned revolutionaries of catastrophe, but at the same time, disgusted by the human element, I am eagerly anticipating their arrival.

The fundamental premise of the revolution is that the world is dying because it is in its nature. Catastrophes, whether natural or caused by humans, are part of the system of the world in which we live. The fundamental forces that hold the universe together are inclined towards separation, as they have been forced into the current order by a higher will, the essence of which I will omit from this discussion, as it has been a subject of contemplation for wise minds for centuries. I will only say that this higher will established the world and then left it to its natural outcome, which, according to the revolution’s vision, is disintegration into its constituent elements that belong to entirely different energies. This rule applies both on a micro and macro level. It is important to emphasize that this does not refer to nuclear or other forces understood by the parameters of modern science, but rather to a completely subjective view of the structure of the world. From the standpoint I occupy, it is irrelevant whether my views align or diverge from generally accepted perspectives, which are supposedly objective, having been arrived at through scientific, i.e., empirical and measurable methods. Similarly, my worldview diverges from the horizons of religious doctrine. The standards of my objectivity are different. My method is neither scientific, nor is my goal religious.

One of the key rules of the revolution is the rejection of other people's points of view, interpretations, and truths, simply because they belong to others. Someone might say that truth is singular, and that there cannot be multiple truths; however, I would oppose such a stance by asserting that my will creates what is truth for me, and I am not concerned if it contradicts the truth of many or even all other people. I could adopt the view that other people do not actually exist, and therefore their perspectives are insignificant, and so too is what they declare to be the truth. The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe as a doctrine denies the significance of the existence of other people and the significance of the human species in its entirety. The fact that I am incarnated as a human being points to my own delusion about the nature of what I am. Just as other people do not exist, neither do I exist, for they are not human, nor am I human, nor do they have a self, nor is my self real. The revolution is the path to liberating consciousness from the conditioning of reality. Paradoxically, the path of the revolution is not a quest for truth or for some higher or more real reality, but the systematic negation of any reality, and thus any truth. Reality can only be real if it is illusory.

Let us return once more to the nature of the constituent elements of the universe. The viewpoint I adopt suggests that the universe is composed of two fundamental opposing forces. The nature of one is chaos, and the other is cosmos. One is light, the other is darkness. One is yang, the other is yin. A higher will has shaped the patterns of their mixing and intertwining so that together they form the universe, both in things and phenomena infinitely large and those infinitely small. The creation of the cosmos is the great blending of two substances that, in their separate forms, exist apart, though that existence, by the standards of rational objectivity, cannot be real, and thus could be denied that attribute—but that does not fundamentally change things. The cosmos-creating will has displaced matter from a completely different universe, mixing that matter with what exists beyond any universe, creating this universe in which we find ourselves. I had no need for further philosophizing about the reasons and nature of the cosmos-creating will, but accepted it as an axiomatic given. The consequence of this is a universe that tends toward disintegration, for its basic components can only exist temporarily. Just as the entire created universe tends toward dissolution, so does every individual phenomenon within it.

The form of existence I temporarily occupy is, as the word itself suggests, temporary and inclined toward its end. All human creations also tend toward disintegration. Every personal and collective progress serves to accelerate that disintegration. Every step we take “forward” is a step closer to our end. Thus, it is pointless to attribute significance either to oneself or to human creations, traditions, values, beliefs, morality, or history. Of course, this does not mean that all these phenomena lack their own laws or that they should not be studied. I observe the trends of these changes as the laws of the spirit of the age. I do not believe that the cosmos-creating will is at all concerned with them, as its nature is to create the cosmos. That will, within temporary and entropic conditions, has created its masterpiece, cosmic perfection, which is (oh, paradox!)—a universe of chaos. I say chaos because what is cosmic within it is in the role of returning to its original disordered state. The substance that is an intruder in this plane will sooner or later return to where it was incarnated by the cosmos-creating will. Everything is subordinated to that goal. Light has been cast into darkness so that, after completing the circle of existence, it may return to a state of non-change. Darkness is temporarily disturbed by the presence of light and seeks either to devour or expel it, so it may also return to its primordial nirvana. Every substance strives to return to the primordial state of its purity. Mixed-nature phenomena are not meant to last forever, nor to change forever; rather, they serve a purpose contained within the cosmos-creating will, and it is utterly pointless to theorize about it.

How does all of this reflect on people, their communities, societies, and history? Is it not enough to take a brief look around in search of an answer to that question? Hence, the ideological premises of the Divine Revolution of Catastrophe are profoundly nihilistic. It is a radical nihilism aimed at accelerating change to liberate the imprisoned substance that belongs, so to speak, to the universe of order. When these ideas first emerged in my mind, I was unaware that I had discovered nothing new but that a similar conceptual framework had been developed in the 16th century by the great kabbalist Isaac Luria. Similarly, regarding specific ideological and methodological derivatives, I was unaware that the doctrine of radical antinomian action had already been formulated by Shabbetai Tzvi and Jacob Frank, two apostate kabbalists of the 17th and 18th centuries, who, based on Lurianic Kabbalah, produced astonishing doctrines. However, unlike the two aforementioned figures, my concept is even more radical.

In the introduction to the first edition of The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe, I wrote that anything is better than the fate destined for humans. Every uncertainty is better than any certainty. Every certainty is part of the fate destined for humans. Uncertainty is the only chance to escape from the certainty destined for us. Everything about us that we consider natural is not natural but part of the certainty destined for us. Uncertainty is a sweet torment before the horror of certainty. Let us embark on uncertainty, for the only certainty is nothingness. Now I would add to this introduction the thought that nature is structured in such a way that we cannot expect great changes from small horrors. Therefore, let us move toward great horrors… Let us keep in mind that whenever the forces of darkness make a move, they create the possibility for the brave to strike back or escape from an unfavorable situation. Thus, let us rejoice in the initiatives of the servants of darkness, and in the catastrophic and apocalyptic trends of the spirit of the age, for they open up opportunities.

The exalted person will not involve themselves in conflicts, divisions, and disputes. Their task is to remember and know, to learn and to pass on. In relation to everything, they must maintain a royal distance with a foundation in a kind of healthy indifference, a balance of the heart, without hating or loving, cheering, attacking, defending, or advocating. Being negative, being against, is the lowest and most primitive form of mobilization of will. Being constructive, being for, is a higher level, superior to the previous one. Being indifferent, but not in a blunt and immobile way, rather indifferent in a state of calm from which any effective and purposeful action may arise, is the third and more exalted form of mobilization of will.

To whom is the message of the *Divine Revolution of Catastrophe* intended? Not to a group, but to the individual, and specifically to the individual who has been touched by a special power. This individual will be guided and protected by that power. They will know exactly what to do, from one station to the next. This individual will choose one path and will not scatter in all directions. They will be a master in that one. This has nothing to do with the modalities of self-improvement that we know, as it is the power that makes the selection, not the personality. Furthermore, this power does not seek anyone's consent. If someone is chosen, then they are chosen, and thus provided with everything necessary.

One of the fundamental microcosmic crises, aside from the ever-present existential one, is actually of a philosophical nature. It is a crisis of worldview from which many other personal crises emerge. Modern people lack a clear and coherent view of the world, which deprives them of unnecessary internal tension caused by sharp contradictions. Therefore, many who encounter the ideas of this book for the first time will, in some way, be disturbed and will rebel against these ideas. I believe that some might be offended by certain statements and viewpoints or might be vigorously opposed. As I mentioned earlier, I do not claim that everything presented in this book is true in any general sense. These are simply my facts that form my truth and worldview. However, even as such, these facts do not exist in my mind as final truths. A change in perspective on things, phenomena, and relationships produces a change in the understanding of truth. Nevertheless, despite this relativity, I maintain that my truth, as presented here, is truer than many current generally accepted truths and their also generally accepted alternatives.

This book can also be viewed as a small encyclopedia of my truths. Of course, whatever anyone who reads it thinks about this book and its author will be correct. From the perspective of those who have reached such a conclusion, their judgment will undoubtedly be true. This is entirely fine, as truth is a clown with countless faces, of which we, during our brief lives, manage to encounter only one, two, or possibly three. Our fundamental limitation is precisely that we cannot see ourselves through the eyes of others. We know only as much about ourselves as we are self-aware, and even less about others. We do not know what it is like to be someone else or something else. We are molded and confined by our personality, our unique and singular appearance, our energy, anatomy, culture, heritage, and ultimately our species. As individuals, we do not have the experience of the self-awareness of others. Hence, the exclusivity and multitude of derived exclusive truths and facts, or perceptual experiences or phenomena that we interpret and turn into facts.

If this book helps someone in seeking or constructing their own truth, then its purpose will have been fulfilled. I do not wish to impose my own truth but rather to serve as an example from which anyone can build their own unique truth, a worldview that may not fit anywhere and may be unacceptable to others. In this way, anyone can become the architect of their own fortune without being a follower of someone else. It is not my intention to declare what is good for me as the common good or to attribute universal significance to my truth. Those for whom current truths and facts are also, for some reason, unacceptable, and who find my truth appealing, should feel free to adopt it, partially or fully, at least until the moment when they too will say goodbye to it.

The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe is a profoundly antihuman book and is in contrast to prevailing ideas about humanity, mankind, and humaneness. It is antihuman because it is not anthropocentric. It is pedagogical because it admonishes and teaches. It is prophetic because it not only points to the consequences of the current course of humanity but also to the far-reaching outcomes of that movement. One of its fundamental ideas is that the destiny of humanity follows the destiny of a higher or lower order, which is the destiny of the physical Universe that I have depicted as a process of entropy and the history of mankind as decadence. This represents my fundamental touch with some traditional views, but the break is in the method of action. The idea of the book is a conscious and deliberate abandonment of anthropocentrism, a break with collectivity, and survival in extreme individualism. Involution is a collective phenomenon and is the iron law of decadence. Evolution is exceptional and always individual, which is why it is necessary to separate oneself from all forms of collectivity and affiliation and to survive in an almost cosmic solitude.

The future does not belong to everyone, but to those who have fought for it. Similarly, freedom does not belong to everyone, nor does truth. Logical illusions are logical, while truth is illogical, but which mind is capable of consciously maintaining a contradiction within itself and thus existing in this world while awaiting the moment of death? Although dark, the spirit of this book is still on the side of life, but not just any and every life, and not at any cost. The Divine Revolution of Catastrophe has a revolutionary intent and an almost impossible task. In this sense, its goal is clear: to inspire revolutionary spirits to action, reaction, and counteraction. Revolutionaries in the context of this doctrine are not merely rebels. They are solitary and cursed, but free from everything and everyone. Cloaked in darkness, they cultivate an inner, externally invisible flame within the gloom. To cloak oneself in darkness, one must have great faith in one's own inner light.

The fate of the world does not concern revolutionaries. Their mode of action is extremely individualistic and destructive towards the human world. Without egoism, there is no individualism, but this egoism is an egocentric manifestation of action and will, not a self-serving pursuit. The revolutionary places himself at the center of the Universe. He is the point around which an infinite circle is drawn. In this sense, he is the greatest possible egomaniac. Outside the context of the soul as the center of being, the ego as a function of the spirit has little purpose unless it is woven into a meaning that transcends it, which does not break or restrain it, but corrects its imperfections. The ideal ego is like a perfect sphere. Such an ego can easily be compressed or transformed into a vesica or an infinity symbol. This is the ego of revolution and its bearers, the ego of active Beauty that radiates in all directions.