About spiritual ethics

The character of his followers, worshipers, and admirers best speaks of the authenticity of a spiritual teacher. If you really respect your teacher, doctrine or worldview, which you adopted from him, you will never impose it on anyone.

Friday 2 August 2024

The Art of Memory and Kabbalistic-Hermetic Sources of Tarot

This text is taken from my book Ideology of the Tarot. 
If you want to buy this book, write to dorijan.nuaj@gmail.com

In the search for the Kabbalistic sources of tarot, we cannot overlook some well-known figures. As is known, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola was the first in the Christian West to write about Kabbalah, relying on translations of Hebrew texts into Latin done for him by the learned Jewish convert Raymondo Moncada (known as Flavius Mithridates). In a way, Mirandola is the father of the so-called Christian Kabbalah, but its significant codifier or editor was the famous Jesuit Athanasius Kircher, who greatly influenced the understanding of Kabbalah among later occultists. It is also worth mentioning Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, who included Kabbalistic magic in his famous and influential book De Occulta Philosophia (Antwerp, 1531). However, it should be noted that neither Mirandola nor Agrippa mentioned tarot even once. Lastly, in the context of the development of Christian Kabbalism and the general opening of Kabbalah outside Jewish initiatory circles, Johannes Reuchlin, a Catholic humanist and follower of Mirandola, is worth mentioning, as well as Francesco Giorgi (who influenced the work of Athanasius Kircher and his understanding of Kabbalah, as Kircher's schemes were derived from Giorgi's book De Harmonia Mundi (1525), Balthasar Walther, whose teachings influenced Jakob Böhme, and the famous Christian Knorr von Rosenroth, author of the influential Kabbala Denudata (1678), among others. At that time, among European occultists, Kabbalah was already inseparable from Hermeticism, astrology, and magic.

At this point, I would like to highlight the Hermetic "memory theater" of Giulio Camillo. It is a beautifully decorated, picturesque didactic mnemonic mechanism in the form of a theater, made of wood, designed for one or a few viewers. Frances Yates described Camillo's memory theater as a structure meant to reflect the order of eternal truth, where the entire universe can be memorized through the organic interconnectedness of all its parts with the eternal order upon which they are based. Similarly, we might say that the creators of the tarot also wanted their work to reflect the order of eternal truth. Camillo's theater is too complex to be given the space it deserves hherere, but I encourage readers to explore this concept and understand its Kabbalistic-Hermetic foundation and study its similarity to the Mantegna Tarocchi and the Visconti-Sforza tarot system. These are all visual systems for memorizing the principles of the universe and developing an analogical way of thinking, connecting phenomena, beings, and processes within a unified symbolic whole. In Camillo's theater, as Yates emphasizes, the idea of memory organically connected with the universe is presented. His theater is based on a system of forty-nine images, with the observer, standing at the center of the theater like an actor on a stage, being the fiftieth element. The number forty-nine is the squared expression of the seven planetary principles. In Camillo's theater, each planet has seven forms of manifestation represented by appropriate images, arranged in a specific order. It is a mental machine for mapping the universe. Camillo's theater, like Kircher's scheme, is divided into seven main levels, each containing seven sections. The Promethean level includes skills, science, religion, and law. The Banquet level represents the separation of elements from water. The Cave signifies the merging of elements. The creation of the human spirit is set at the level of the three Gorgons. The level of Pasiphae and the Bull involves the merging of the human soul and body. The sandals of Mercury describe human natural activities.

In The Art of Memory, Yates points out a significant change in the art of memory that occurred during the Renaissance. According to her, although this art still uses loci and images according to established rules, there was a radical philosophical and psychological change in its background; it was no longer scholastic but Neoplatonic. Similarly, Camillo's Neoplatonism was fully infused with Hermetic influences. Hermeticism, as Yates says, was introduced into the heart of the Renaissance by Marsilio Ficino. Pico della Mirandola added elements from his popularization of Jewish Kabbalah in a Christianized form to this foundation. These two types of cosmic mysticism are related, Yates writes, and thus merged into a form of Hermetic-Kabbalistic tradition. According to Frances Yates, this sparked a new direction in the art of memory. From that moment, the human mind and memory, in a sense, become "divine," as they have the power to grasp the highest levels of reality through imagination driven by magic. The Hermetic art of memory thus became occult, becoming a magical instrument. Yates concludes that only the occult tradition re-embraced the art of memory, expanding it with new forms and breathing new life into it.

All these ideas influenced the subsequent development of the tarot, culminating in the creation of the so-called occult tarot in the 19th and 20th centuries, which is completely Hermetic-Kabbalistic and astrological. Here lie the roots of modern occult tarot ideology. This ideology is simultaneously a form of an emerging speculative and ideological worldview. This worldview took the glittering symbolic forms that attracted it from the fragments of older perspectives, embedding them into a completely new and different structure whose purpose was to indicate a clear and undeniable discontinuity with any old tradition.